Trending December 2023 # Two Massive Dlcs Are Supposedly Coming To Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Soon # Suggested January 2024 # Top 21 Popular

You are reading the article Two Massive Dlcs Are Supposedly Coming To Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Soon updated in December 2023 on the website Tai-facebook.edu.vn. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Two Massive Dlcs Are Supposedly Coming To Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Soon

Two massive DLCs are supposedly coming to Assassin’s Creed Valhalla soon

239

Share

X

Assassin’s Creed fans are on the edge of their seats, waiting for updates on this topic.

Two new awesome DLCs are supposedly coming to the latest title in the game series.

The largest one will feature 40 hours of gameplay and be named Dawn of Ragnarok.

Dawn of Ragnarok has been leaked by Ubisoft China and we could see it in March.

This one is for all the Assassin’s Creed series fans out there. We know that everybody’s currently wondering about the next downloadable content for Valhalla, so here’s an interesting update.

Even though this is not yet official information, we’re pretty sure that you will get excited when hearing about this.

So, without any further ado, let’s dive right into the subject and find out what exactly Ubisoft is planning for us in the near future.

Dawn of Ragnarok photos got leaked by Ubisoft China

It seems that it’s safe to say that at least one of these two expansions is going to become reality soon. Some new promotional material for Assassin’s Creed Valhalla: Dawn of Ragnarok got leaked.

Apparently, this leak came from Ubisoft China and absolutely flooded the Internet. The new content is expected to launch on March 10, 2023, and focuses on the events leading up to the Norse apocalypse known as Ragnarok.

Allegedly, the action takes place in the Nine Realms of Norse Mythology, which are threatened by the invasion of the Kingdom of Frost and Flames.

The text depicts an image of the Kingdom of Dwarves in Wat Alheim, which faces destruction, and Odin’s son Baldr, who has been kidnapped by the immortal fire giant Surtr.

You, as Aivor, have to personally experience the fate of Odin, the war of the North, and the destiny of the God of Wisdom.

Get ready to explore a world of mythology, save Odin’s children, and unleash a brand-new thunderbolt ability. You must save your flesh and blood before the gods are swallowed by Ragnarok.

Ubisoft might be more inclined to make an announcement soon, given the fact that this is not a secret anymore.

Seems like we will finally delve further into the supernatural elements of this beloved franchise, but exactly how this ties to the larger Assassin’s Creed universe remains to be seen.

Two brand new expansions are coming to Valhalla

Platforms such as Twitter and Reddit are absolutely buzzing with rumours about the new content that is supposedly coming to Assasin’s Creed Valhalla.

Apparently, the first one, which is much larger than the second, is going to be called Dawn of Ragnarok, and it will be around 40 hours long.

We don’t exactly know how to interpret the “God of War-style” part, but we’re guessing that it could be set in the mythological realm of Svartalfheim.

Die-hard fans of the game have found what they think is a lot of clues that kind of gives away Ubisoft’s pans.

As we mentioned, these are still rumours, as no official information has been made public regarding this matter. Nonetheless, it’s a subject worth keeping an eye on, especially if you are a fan.

Moving on to the second rumoured DLC, fans haven’t found a potential name for it just yet, but the belief is that we are going to the island of Skye (Scotland) and meeting Odyssey´s Kassandra.

This sounds a bit more plausible, as an Assassin’s Creed Odyssey crossover bundle of information got leaked a while back.

Anyway, this comes as no surprise for the great majority of AC players, as they were already expecting some extra goodies from game creators.

But even though this information is worth getting excited about, some don’t even believe this will happen, and most think that it will just be more boring content added.

40 hours of additional gameplay in AC means 40 hours of climbing towers, taking out camps and doing fetch quests across the map 400 times

— Mathias (@InfinityTias) December 7, 2023

The two DLCs we mentioned in this article are supposedly going to be announced at The Game Awards this month, so we’re going to keep an eye out for any development

Was this page helpful?

x

Start a conversation

You're reading Two Massive Dlcs Are Supposedly Coming To Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Soon

Covid’s Coming Back In Europe. Are We Next?

Across Europe, COVID cases are rising once again. Much of the western part of the continent, including Germany, France, the UK, and Italy, are experiencing sustained increases in outbreaks over the last two weeks. Switzerland and Austria are both reporting per-capita case rates that exceed those during the Omicron surge in the US. In Scotland, one in every 14 residents had COVID in the last week. So far, however, deaths haven’t increased across the region.

There are signs that the US could be headed in the same direction. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that in 25 percent of the wastewater surveillance sites it tracks across the country, COVID readings have at least doubled in a week. As the Pandemic Prevention Institute pointed out on Twitter, those counts could just be noisy data—when COVID rates are low, as they are now, doubling isn’t necessarily a significant change.

So why would cases be increasing just as a global wave subsides? In both Europe and the US, a more infectious lineage of Omicron, called BA.2 (sometimes described as “stealth Omicron”)” is spreading rapidly. At the same time, public health officials on both continents have relaxed mitigation efforts, although European protocols were much more stringent than America’s to begin with. Denmark and Switzerland no longer require vaccine verification to enter restaurants. Hawaii is now the only US state with an indoor mask mandate. 

Those two forces combined are probably driving the COVID wave in Europe, infectious disease researchers told Popular Science. And because Europe resembles the US in terms of vaccinations, prior outbreaks, and COVID policies, it’s probably a model for another surge here—if not for the human toll an outbreak would take.

[Related: ‘Deltacron’ could exist after all]

Early reports showed that the antibodies a person produces in response to other types of Omicron do recognize BA.2, and should protect them from infection, at least for a while. But more recent research has suggested that the Omicron lineages vary enough to require different levels—and probably types—of antibodies. “‘Protective’ isn’t a binary switch,” Kristian Andersen, who studies the evolution of viruses at Scripps Research, writes in an email to PopSci. “BA.1-induced immunity will provide protection against BA.2 infection, but … I expect that effect will wane faster.”

Research on previous waves found that people are extremely unlikely to be reinfected with the same COVID strain within nine months of recovering. But BA.2 might cut that period down significantly.

“With infinitely more cases, yes, it wasn’t the same ratio of hospitalizations. But it’s still absolutely high. A death is a death.”

Susan Hassig, an epidemiologist at Tulane University

Because the first Omicron wave peaked in the US about two months ago, immunity from those infections may have waned enough to give BA.2 a larger population of susceptible hosts. (With an extremely infectious virus, it doesn’t take many susceptible individuals to fuel an outbreak.) In Europe, the initial wave of Omicron came earlier, and BA.2 became dominant in February, so the continent could be a preview of what might happen next in the US.

That, coupled with the increased infectiousness of the subvariant, might explain rising case numbers on both sides of the Atlantic. According to an analysis by Financial Times data scientist John Burn-Murdoch, overall case counts in Europe have grown in tandem with rising BA.2 rates. Right now, BA.2 causes about a quarter of all COVID cases in the US, according to CDC estimates, but that number has grown steadily since January. The Northeast seems to be on the leading edge of that curve. Nathan Grubaugh, an epidemiologist at Yale University who uses viral genetics to investigate disease transmission, tells PopSci that the variant might cause all new COVID cases in Connecticut by mid-April.

But that’s probably only the first part of the equation. “A lot of European countries were seeing an increase in cases right after they released indoor mask mandates,” says Boston University’s Hamer. The faster-spreading variant might have taken off at the exact same time as people began to gather indoors unmasked. The US saw a similar surge after it lowered its defenses in the summer of 2023.

“The timing of this with masks coming off isn’t great,” says Grubaugh, “and I just hope that our leaders and we as a society are willing to put them back on if the cases do indeed start rising.”

Sorting out the exact role of indoor mask requirements or social distancing policies is extremely challenging. “The bottom line is, masking will still slow transmission, no matter which variant it is,” says Susan Hassig, an epidemiologist at Tulane University. “But it’s hard to know how much impact the mask mandates were having before they were dropped. We’ve never really been able to measure that effectively.” People don’t always follow COVID policies when they are in place—and plenty of individuals, especially those at personal risk, will continue wearing a face covering without a mandate, or just stop going into public altogether.

Right now, the CDC’s new guidance only recommends wearing a mask indoors when cases in a US county skyrocket to above 200 per 100,000 residents in a week. Rising hospitalization rates can also trigger mitigation policies. As public health researchers Julia Raifman and Eleanor Murray wrote in the Washington Post earlier in March, those guidelines encourage mask use only after a new surge is well underway. What’s more, the CDC’s updated recommendations don’t explicitly instruct local governments to implement distancing or masking policies, which “has basically given jurisdictions a free pass not to do anything,” says Hassig.

[Related: Masks can work—even if you’re the only one wearing them]

While the experts who spoke to Popular Science agreed that some kind of BA.2 outbreak is likely in the US, their opinion on the consequences are more mixed.

When asked if Europe’s growing outbreak would be followed by a surge of hospitalizations and deaths, Hamer says, “I would be willing to bet no.” Even if BA.2 is able to spread among people who already had another strain of Omicron, they should have built up enough antibodies to avoid severe symptoms. People who are both vaccinated and previously caught Omicron should be even safer.

But Europe has a much more heavily vaccinated population than the US. Roughly two-thirds of adults in the EU have received a booster dose. More critically, 90 percent of everyone over the age of 50 in the UK has had a booster, and the picture is similar across western Europe. Many of the people most vulnerable in an outbreak are also highly protected. In the US, only 66 percent of those over the age of 65 have been boosted, so the consequences of a surge could be more dire.

Hassig calls the idea that cases and hospitalizations have “decoupled” during recent waves deceptive. Denmark, which has been especially quick to end restrictions at bars, end vaccine requirements, and lift mask policies on that logic, had a per-capita death rate that approached America’s during the Omicron outbreaks. “We had nearly as many people hospitalized in Omicron as we did in other surges,” Hassig says. “With infinitely more cases, so yes, it wasn’t the same ratio. But it’s still absolutely high. A death is a death.”

It’s hard to know whether that means the US will see a wave of hospitalizations like it did when Omicron peaked. Europe is only a week or two into its new wave, which means it’s still too early to use data from there to draw predictions for the states. What’s clear is this: The pandemic isn’t over, even if governments are putting away the tools to fight it.

How To Check If Two Vectors Are Exactly Same In R?

To check if two vectors are exactly same, we can use identical function.

For example, if we have two vectors say x and y then we can find whether both of them are exactly same or not by using the command given below −

identical(x,y)

Check out the below examples to understand the result of identical function for two vectors.

Example 1

To check if two vectors are exactly same, use the command given below −

x1<-rpois(100,5) x1

If you execute the above given command, it generates the following output −

[1] 6 6 3 3 0 5 3 6 6 4 5 7 4 9 10 1 5 2 8 4 9 2 9 6 4 [26] 8 3 4 5 5 8 7 2 4 7 4 3 3 6 6 3 5 5 9 6 6 3 6 4 5 [51] 3 4 9 3 3 7 8 3 9 5 6 6 3 7 8 3 3 8 5 5 4 3 5 6 4 [76] 1 4 5 6 4 1 8 3 7 5 1 1 6 3 3 3 5 5 3 4 7 2 7 6 7

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

y1<-rpois(100,5) y1

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] 6 3 5 5 3 3 7 6 6 3 5 10 5 10 6 3 5 6 2 6 6 6 3 3 5 [26] 3 6 11 5 8 2 6 3 3 5 4 5 5 6 7 8 6 1 5 4 5 6 5 3 3 [51] 7 11 4 3 5 3 1 4 3 6 6 3 4 5 4 7 4 3 4 2 4 3 4 5 1 [76] 4 3 5 3 1 6 3 6 5 8 7 2 2 8 4 7 3 6 4 3 10 5 4 2 4

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

x1<-rpois(100,5) y1<-rpois(100,5) identical(x1,y1) Output

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] FALSE Example 2

To check if two vectors are exactly same, use the command given below −

x2<-sample(0:9,150,replace=TRUE) x2

If you execute the above given command, it generates the following output −

[1] 7 5 1 1 9 3 7 2 7 8 2 7 3 3 1 9 6 4 7 9 3 1 4 2 1 5 5 8 0 8 9 0 7 3 1 9 5 [38] 6 7 9 6 3 7 0 9 7 7 7 0 5 7 0 1 5 9 0 9 4 5 2 5 4 1 9 4 5 9 6 8 2 9 1 5 4 [75] 8 5 7 1 5 0 2 3 9 2 2 4 9 1 6 3 7 7 3 1 5 3 3 1 3 1 9 5 3 1 6 1 0 8 4 0 4 [112] 1 6 4 5 0 8 0 4 6 0 4 3 4 4 2 1 5 8 4 0 2 7 4 1 0 9 6 5 8 4 1 6 8 0 4 6 7 [149] 1 5

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

y2<-sample(0:9,150,replace=TRUE) y2

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] 8 3 3 4 3 2 1 5 5 4 6 2 5 4 5 7 6 2 8 7 2 2 8 1 7 5 1 9 4 8 2 9 3 1 6 3 5 [38] 5 7 6 3 0 0 5 0 7 7 7 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 5 3 0 8 0 7 5 9 8 5 1 0 9 4 7 8 6 5 7 [75] 8 9 0 5 8 3 6 8 3 1 0 4 3 8 6 7 6 5 1 4 0 3 8 6 8 8 6 4 3 0 6 8 4 3 1 5 1 [112] 7 0 1 7 4 7 1 6 3 5 7 1 6 0 9 9 3 3 1 5 5 6 6 4 7 6 2 4 5 0 9 5 8 9 5 9 4 [149] 7 7

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

x2<-sample(0:9,150,replace=TRUE) y2<-sample(0:9,150,replace=TRUE) identical(x2,y2) Output

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] FALSE Example 3

To check if two vectors are exactly same, use the command given below −

x3<-1:150 x3

If you execute the above given command, it generates the following output −

[1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 145 146 147 148 149 150

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

y3<-1:150 y3

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 145 146 147 148 149 150

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

x3<-1:150 y3<-1:150 identical(x3,y3) Output

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] TRUE Example 4

To check if two vectors are exactly same, use the command given below −

x4<-150:1 x4

If you execute the above given command, it generates the following output −

[1] 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 [19] 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 [37] 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 [55] 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 [73] 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 [91] 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 [109] 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 [127] 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 [145] 6 5 4 3 2 1

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

y4<-1:150 y4

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 145 146 147 148 149 150

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

x4<-150:1 y4<-1:150 identical(x4,y4) Output

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] FALSE Example 5

To check if two vectors are exactly same, use the command given below −

x5<-round(rnorm(150),0) x5

If you execute the above given command, it generates the following output −

[1] 0 0 -1 -1 0 -1 -1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0 -1 [26] 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 -1 2 1 -1 1 -1 0 0 1 0 [51] 1 0 1 1 1 0 -3 0 0 -1 1 1 0 -1 0 -1 1 1 0 -1 0 -1 0 0 0 [76] 2 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 -1 -1 2 1 -1 1 -1 0 -1 0 0 0 2 [101] 0 0 1 1 0 -1 -2 1 -1 -1 1 0 1 2 1 0 -1 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 [126] -2 -1 0 1 2 1 -1 0 1 0 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 0 -1 0 -1 -1 1 1 1 0

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

y5<-round(rnorm(150),0) y5

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] -2 0 -2 0 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 -1 -2 -1 1 -2 -1 -1 0 0 0 -1 1 0 [26] 1 0 1 -1 0 0 -2 -1 1 0 -1 0 1 1 -2 1 0 -1 0 -2 1 1 -1 1 -2 [51] 1 0 2 0 -1 1 -1 0 0 -1 0 -3 -1 1 -1 1 0 -2 0 -1 1 0 -1 -1 -1 [76] 1 0 1 1 0 -1 0 0 -1 1 -1 1 1 0 0 -1 -1 0 0 -1 0 0 -2 -2 0 [101] -1 1 -1 -1 0 0 1 -1 -2 -1 1 0 -3 -1 0 -1 1 0 2 -3 0 1 -1 0 0 [126] 1 1 -1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 -2 -1 1 0 1 -1 -1 0 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 0 0

To check if two vectors are exactly same, add the following to the above command −

x5<-round(rnorm(150),0) y5<-round(rnorm(150),0) identical(x5,y5) Output

If you execute all the above given commands as a single program, it generates the following output −

[1] FALSE

Windows 10 To Get Two

Microsoft is continuing its crusade to get CIOs interested in Windows 10, touting new security features that include two-factor authentication built directly into the OS.

Overall, Windows 10 will offer businesses enhanced security in areas like identity protection and access control, information protection and threat resistance, since security “has been central to many of the customer conversations I’ve had since we announced the availability of the [Windows 10] Technical Preview,” wrote Jim Alkove in the blog post, referring to the pre-release version of Windows 10 that is publicly available for testing.

In the area of identity and access control, Windows 10 will offer IT managers the necessary functions to protect user credentials and devices with two-factor authentication, without having to rely on third-party products, he wrote.

“We believe this solution brings identity protection to a new level as it takes multi-factor security which today is limited to solutions such as smartcards and builds it right into the operating system and device itself, eliminating the need for additional hardware security peripherals,” Alkove wrote.

More specifically, Windows 10 will let users enroll their devices as one of the two authentication factors, with the second being either a pin or a biometric input, such as the reading of a fingerprint.

“From a security standpoint, this means that an attacker would need to have a user’s physical device—in addition to the means to use the user’s credential—which would require access to the users PIN or biometric information,” he wrote.

The new user credentialing system will be supported by Microsoft’s Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, and consumer Microsoft Accounts “so enterprises and consumers using Microsoft online services will quickly be able to move away from passwords.”

“With Windows 10 we aim to eliminate this type of attack with an architectural solution that stores user access tokens within a secure container running on top of Hyper-V technology. This solution prevents the tokens from being extracted from devices even in cases where the Windows kernel itself has been compromised,” he wrote.

“Protection of corporate data in Windows 10 enables automatic encryption of corporate apps, data, email, website content and other sensitive information, as it arrives on the device from corporate network locations,” he wrote.

Windows 10’s new Start menu and windowed Metro apps.

The DLP technology will also work on Windows Phone, and documents will be covered by this protection as they’re accessed from different desktop and mobile devices.

IT managers will be able to establish policies that control which apps can access corporate data, and Windows 10 also extends VPN control options to protect this data in devices owned by employees.

Finally, in the area of threat and malware resistance, Windows 10 will have features to lock down devices and only allow users to run apps that have been signed using a Microsoft provided signing service.

“Access to the signing service will be controlled using a vetting process similar to how we control ISV publishing access to the Windows Store and the devices themselves will be locked down by the OEM,” he wrote. “The lockdown process OEMs will use is similar to what we do with Windows Phone devices.”

IT administrators will be able to determine which apps they consider trustworthy, such as those they sign themselves, those signed by ISVs, those available on the Windows Store, or all of them.

Microsoft is aiming to ship Windows 10 by mid-2023, and in the meantime it’s publicly testing in an open program which recently topped 1 million participants and has generated 200,000 feedback items.

After Windows 8 was thoroughly ignored by Microsoft’s enterprise customers, the company is bending over backwards in its attempts to make CIOs and other enterprise IT executives pay attention to Windows 10.

As the OS goes through its pre-release public testing, it’ll become clearer whether the Windows 10 security improvements that Alkove is trumpeting today end up being compelling enough for business customers.

Nfc Seen Coming To The Next Iphone

When a high-ranked Apple executive says Apple won’t do something, expect quite the opposite. So when Apple’s worldwide marketing chief Phil Schiller told the Wall Street Journal that Passbook, a new app in iOS 6, won’t be a direct payment product, there was more to his words than met the eye.

We’ve also heard countless rumors involving an Near Field Communication NFC chip coming to the next iPhone to provide a hardware basis for secure contactless payments on the go. Apparently, recent code dumps that broke the taller iPhone news also indicate that NFC controllers are directly connected to the power management unit of the next iPhone…

Folks like SITA’s CTO Jim Peters are convinced that Apple will make NFC happen with this year’s iPhone revision, said to be slated for launch in October. He expects 2012 iPhones with NFC to dominate e-tickets.

Noting that carriers, handset makers and Google are all trying to upend one another in order to take a cut of NFC transactions, he observed Apple’s focus on the end user will help the company mainstream mobile payments:

Who is thinking of the user? Apple. They don’t argue about it with anybody. They came out with Passbook last week, which is an electronic wallet that they are going to start putting stuff on.

He then dropped the bomb:

They are going to get people using it (the Passbook application) and then all of a sudden they will allow credit cards to be used in there, on the next iPhone, which will include NFC.

Speaking at the annual Air Transport IT Summit in Brussels, Belgium, Peters summed it up:

You need to get ready, this is coming. This is going to happen. By the end of the year the majority of smartphones that you go and buy will have NFC on them. If in October the next iPhone comes out and it has NFC on it, it’s game over.

MasterCard’s Ed McLaughlin is also adamant that Apple is working on a wireless mobile payment system that involves NFC and iTunes, recently dropping the following hint:

I don’t know of a handset manufacturer that isn’t in process of making sure their stuff is PayPass ready.

Seth Weintraub, who runs 9to5Mac, notes the possible implications of NFC hardware in the next iPhone:

The implications here are obviously monstrous. With the recently announced PassBook application (which we detailed prior to its announcement while speculating about an NFC tie-in), Apple will be set to compete with Google Wallet and the similar service Microsoft unveiled last week.

And provided Cupertino partners with payment processors, it could process real-world transactions via iTunes:

Apple could tie in with a payment processor like Citibank’s PayPass system for credit card transactions or it could become a payment processor of sorts with its hundreds of millions of credit cards already on file at iTunes.

NFC would also allow iPhone users a quick and easy way to share files from one iOS device to another.

I think it’s inevitable that NFC is coming to iPhones now that Google and Microsoft have made some moves in this space. The market for mobile payments is on the verge of exploding and Apple needs a solution to compete.

Not everyone agrees with Weintraub, though.

One of Apple’s many patents involving NFC technology.

One of Apple’s many patents involving NFC technology.

Mike Elgan speculated in his Cult of Mac article titled Inside Apple’s Secret Plan to Kill the Cash Register that Apple could instead tap Bluetooth 4.0 technology for iWallet.

“It’s already in your pocket”, John Brownlee explained in another post at Cult of Mac, apprehending the fact that Bluetooth 4.0 is already found on latest iOS devices.

So. theoretically speaking, all Apple needs to do to make iWallet a reality is ship an app (it just did that with Passbook), cut some partnerships and make iTunes backend changes.

What do you think, will Apple implement NFC hardware inside the next iPhone or find a better solution?

Would you be willing to pay for your groceries using your iPhone and your iTunes credit card on file?

Space Lens Is Coming To Cleanmymac X

Editorial update: the Space Lens feature has been announced and is now part of CleanMyMac X.

We’re big fans of CleanMyMac here at SoftwareHow. It can keep your Mac clean, lean, and running like new. We have given it two favorable reviews (the latest CleanMyMac X and an older version CleanMyMac 3), and after reviewing eight competing apps, named it the Best Mac Cleaning Software. And with the introduction of a powerful new feature, CleanMyMac X is about to get even better.

Space Lens is a feature that will help answer the question, “Why is my drive full?” It helps you identify the files and folders that take up the most space, giving you the opportunity to delete those that are no longer needed and make room for your next project. In this review, we’ll explore Space Lens, how it works, and whether it’s worth having.

What Is Space Lens?

According to MacPaw, Space Lens lets you get a visual size comparison of your folders and files for quick tidying up:

Instant size overview: Browse your storage while seeing what’s taking up the most space.

Quick decision-making: Waste no time checking the size of what you are considering to remove.

In other words, if you need to free up some space on your drive by deleting unneeded files, Space Lens will quickly let you find the ones that will make the most difference.

That all sounds straightforward in theory. I was keen to take it for a spin to find out for myself.

My Test Drive

I opened CleanMyMac X and navigated to Space Lens in the menu on the left. I’m using the trial version of the 4.3.0b1 beta. So I’m not testing the final version of Space Lens, but the earliest public beta. I need to allow for that when making conclusions.

Space Lens took a lengthy 43 minutes to build my space map. Scans should be faster on SSDs and smaller drives, and I imagine performance will be improved by the time the feature is out of beta.

Actually, the progress indicator was at almost 100% in just ten minutes, but progress slowed significantly after that. The app scanned over 740GB even though it initially reported there was only 691GB. Also, disk access was hampered during the scan. Ulysses reported a time-out when trying to save, and screenshots took at least half a minute before they appeared on my desktop.

Saving to disk was fine again once the scan was complete, and a report of how my disk space is used was displayed. There is a list of all files and folders on the left, and an attractive chart on the right that makes it easy to see which files and folders are taking up the most space.

Now I can see where a lot of my space has gone: music and pictures. No surprise there!

It turns out that I have duplicate copies of libraries! In my Music folder I have two iTunes libraries: one is 185GB in size, and last accessed in 2014, the other is 210GB and last accessed today. The old one can probably go. And the same with the Pictures folder: when I migrated my photos over to the new Photos app in 2023, the old iPhotos library was left on my hard drive. Before I delete these old libraries I’ll copy them to a backup drive, just in case. I’ll free up 234GB, which is almost one-quarter of my drive’s capacity!

As I explore further, I encounter a few more surprises. The first is a “Google Drive” folder taking up more than 31GB. Some years ago I experimented with using it as a Dropbox alternative, but stopped using the app and didn’t realize how much space the remaining folder was using. Saving another 31GB will free 265GB in total.

And perfectly illustrates why this app is so useful. I had assumed that gigabytes of data were gone, and they were unnecessarily taking up space on my drive. They might have been there for years before I realized. But they are gone today because I ran Space Lens.

How Do I Get It?

I’m surprised how sloppy my data storage habits have become in the last few years. I appreciate how easy Space Lens is to understand, and how quickly it allowed me to identify wasted space on my drive. If you’d like to do the same on your drive, I recommend it. It will be available in the new version of CleanMyMac X which should be available in late March or April 2023.

Or you can test the public beta today. Be aware that beta software may include experimental features, become unstable, or result in data loss, so use it at your own risk. As mentioned, I encountered a few minor issues, and have passed those onto MacPaw support.

If you’d like to try the beta, do the following:

Download the update, and the app will automatically restart. Then you can start identifying ways you can free up storage space on your Mac’s main drive. How many gigabytes did you save?

Update the detailed information about Two Massive Dlcs Are Supposedly Coming To Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Soon on the Tai-facebook.edu.vn website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!