Trending December 2023 # Governing Ethical Ai: Rules & Regulations Preventing Unethical Ai # Suggested January 2024 # Top 18 Popular

You are reading the article Governing Ethical Ai: Rules & Regulations Preventing Unethical Ai updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Governing Ethical Ai: Rules & Regulations Preventing Unethical Ai

One notable example is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union, which includes specific provisions related to AI. The GDPR requires that organizations using AI must provide clear and transparent information about the use of personal data and must obtain explicit consent for certain uses of data.

Another example is the IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design (EAD) guidelines, which provide a framework for designing AI systems that are aligned with human values. The guidelines cover a wide range of topics, including privacy, transparency, and accountability.

Additionally, there are a number of industry-specific guidelines and regulations for AI. For example, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published guidelines for the responsible use of AI in the financial sector. Similarly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued guidelines for drones’ safe and ethical operation.

In the United States, the government has yet to pass any federal laws specifically related to AI, but some states have passed laws, such as the Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Fairness Act in California.

Principle ies for Ethical AI

When it comes to ensuring responsible and ethical AI development and deployment, there are several key principles and strategies that organizations should keep in mind.

Key Principles:

Transparency: Organizations should be transparent about data collection and use, as well as AI decision-making processes, to build trust with users a duce unintended consequences

Accountability: Organizations should be held accountable for the actions of their AI systems and able to explain and justify decisions to ensure alignment with human values and address negative consequences

Fairness: Organizations should ensure AI systems do not perpetuate societal biases in decision-making by using diverse data sets and regularly testing and monitoring systems’ performance

Key Strategies:

Implement robust testing and validation processes for AI systems to ensure they are working as intended, and errors or biases are identified and addressed

Establish internal review processes to ensure compliance with relevant regulations and guidelines

Invest in building a culture of ethics within the company by providing training and education on AI ethics and fostering transparency, accountability, and fairness

Constantly evaluate and adapt approaches to ensure responsible and ethical AI development and deployment.

Ethical AI in the Government & Private Sector

Both government and private sector organizations have important roles to play in promoting ethical AI.

Government organizations have a responsibility to establish regulations and guidelines for the development and use of AI, in order to protect citizens’ rights and ensure that AI is used responsibly and ethically. This can include measures to protect citizens’ privacy, prevent discrimination, and ensure that AI systems are transparent and accountable. Government organizations can also invest in research and development to support the development of ethical AI and can provide funding and resources for the training and education of AI professionals.

Private sector organizations, on the other hand, have a responsibility to ensure that their own AI systems and practices are in compliance with relevant regulations and guidelines. They should establish internal review processes to ensure that their AI systems are aligned with human values and should be transparent about the data they are collecting and how it is being used. Private sector organizations should also invest in building a culture of ethics within the company and provide their employees with training and education on AI ethics.

In addition, both government and private sector organizations can work together to promote ethical AI by collaborating on research and development, sharing best practices, and participating in industry-wide initiatives and standards-setting bodies.

It’s important to note that promoting ethical AI is a shared responsibility and requires a collaborative effort between the government, the private sector, and society at large.

Navigating Trends & Challenges of AI Governance

One trend is the increasing use of AI in critical infrastructure and high-stakes decision-making, such as healthcare, transportation, and criminal justice. As AI is increasingly used in these areas, it’s crucial to ensure that these systems are safe, reliable, and unbiased.

Another trend is the growing use of AI in the public sector, such as in government services and decision-making. This presents new challenges in terms of transparency, accountability, and public trust.

In addition, there is a growing concern about the potential for AI to be used for malicious purposes, such as cyber-attacks and disinformation campaigns. As AI becomes more sophisticated, it is becoming easier to create realistic fake videos and images, which can be used to spread misinformation and propaganda.

To address these challenges, governments and private sector organizations can work together to establish regulations and guidelines for using AI in critical infrastructure and high-stakes decision-making and promote transparency, accountability, and public trust. Additionally, organizations can invest in research and development to improve the security and robustness of AI systems and to develop technologies that can detect and mitigate malicious use of AI.

Moreover, Governments and organizations should also invest in education and training programs to build a workforce with the necessary skills and knowledge to develop and govern AI ethically and responsibly.


In conclusion, the development and use of Artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to bring significant benefits to society, but it also presents a range of ethical and governance challenges. From job displacement and privacy violations to biased decision-making, it’s crucial to establish guidelines and regulations to govern the ethical use of AI in today’s society. The blog post has discussed the potential negative consequences of AI, current efforts to govern AI, best practices for ethical AI, the role of government and industry in governing AI, and the future of AI governance. It’s essential to understand the importance of AI governance and to work towards ensuring that AI is developed and deployed responsibly and ethically.


Establishing regulations and guidelines for the ethical use of AI is crucial to protect citizens’ rights and prevent negative consequences such as job displacement and privacy violations.

Transparency, accountability, and fairness are key principles for ensuring responsible and ethical AI development and deployment.

Government and private sector organizations are responsible for promoting ethical AI and should work together to establish regulations, share best practices, and invest in research and development.

Ongoing efforts and investments in research, development, education and training are necessary to build a workforce with the necessary skills and knowledge to develop and govern AI ethically and responsibly.

The media shown in this article is not owned by Analytics Vidhya and is used at the Author’s discretion.

You're reading Governing Ethical Ai: Rules & Regulations Preventing Unethical Ai

The New Rules Of Competitive Research

Are you still performing competitor research like you did three, four, even five years ago? Are you crafting your (or your client’s) SEO plan the same way based on what you find? If so, then it’s time to update your strategy. The world of SEO has changed dramatically, and your competitive research should reflect that change. Here’s what you should be looking for when researching competitors, and how to use that information to create a penalty-proof SEO plan.


Just because the competitor is ranking well with tons of spammy, irrelevant links doesn’t mean you should follow suit.  If they haven’t been penalized yet, they might get it in the future. Instead, find out the following.

What is Your Competitor’s Overall Strategy? What Are the Best Links They Have Obtained?

If you or your client has a strong website, aim to get the best links your competitor has obtained as soon as possible. Start with gathering their best links, and then go for even better ones. If Google continues to penalize websites with lots of low quality links, then the ones with fewer but higher quality links (like yours) will be able to shine through.

One easy way to spot your competitors best backlinks is by using tools like CognitiveSEO. Their visual backlink explorer displays high quality links with larger dots.

You can also use the Domain Trustworthiness graph to see the highest authority domains linking to your competitors.

If you prefer an exportable chart, you can filter the backlinks of your competitors by authority and only view the high authority links.

Depending on your industry, you’ll likely find the highest authority links are from .gov or .edu sites, the top blogs in the industry, media networks, and other well-respected sites.

In order to gain these links for yourself, you will need to:

Build relationships with the top industry blogs that will publish your content as a guest or regular contributor.

Build strong profiles on local sites and properly encourage customers to write reviews.

Sign up for HARO and similar networks that connect you to journalists so you can contribute your knowledge in exchange for a mention and a link.


Gone are the days when 300 words of keyword-optimized text were all you needed to get a page ready for your target keywords. Google is not going to reward you for having thousands upon thousands of over-optimized articles on your website. They are going to reward you for having hundreds of high-quality, reader-focused blog posts. Not only that, but they are also going to reward you for having authoritative authors creating that content. When you’re researching the competitor’s content, here are the questions you need to ask.

Who are the authors?

If author rank isn’t playing a role in rankings now, it certainly will be in the future (according to Matt Cutts at least). A part of your competitor research should be focused on who the authors of the competitor’s content are, and how strong are they as authors. Find their Google+ profiles and look at the other sites they’ve written for, how often they are creating content, how many followers they have on Google+, and how much engagement they receive on their Google+ posts.

One tool that can help with this process is the SEOchat Author Links Crawler (free, but currently in beta). You can use it to see what authors are linking to specific sites in order to connect with influential people in your industry. Reach out to them and see if you can get them to create content for you.

What is the length of the average piece of content?

While length isn’t everything, it can certainly help you determine how in-depth competitors go with their content. If their content ranks well in search, and it is generally 1,000 – 2,000 words per piece, but your content or your client’s is only 500 – 600 words per piece, you might want to look into creating more extensive pieces of content.

How much engagement do they receive?

One tool that can help you see the content that receives the most engagement on social media – Twitter in particular – is Topsy. Use the following URL and replace chúng tôi with your competitor’s domain.

You will then see their content links along with the number of tweets each link has received.

Social Media

Having a strong social media presence can be a great asset, especially since you don’t want to put all of your eggs in an organic search basket. If social media isn’t a part of your competitor research, then make sure it does! Ask the following questions.

What networks do the competitors use?

Not what networks do competitors have a profile on, but what networks do they actively use. You’ll generally find that most are active on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, and Pinterest (usually in that order). Also be on the lookout for any niche-specialized social networks and forums that the competitors are using on a regular basis. To find this out, you can simply use Google to search for the competitor’s name – their top social profiles will generally come up in the first couple of pages.

How many followers / fans do they have?

Do you need 1,000 fans, 10,000 fans, or a million fans? Find out by seeing how many people the competitors have in their social networks. If you’re looking for a selling point of why a business should be on social media, this number could play an important role as it shows the number of potential customers that can be found on social media.

Aside from visiting each of the competitor’s social profiles and noting their audience size, one great tool to use to quickly see a group of competitor’s followers and fans is Rival IQ. It allows you to compare the size of your competitor’s audience on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.

You can also use tools like TwitterCounter to see the growth of your competitor’s Twitter following over the time span of up to three months for free, or up to six months with a preview of their premium service by paying with a tweet.

One of the things this will quickly reveal is if your competitor has had any major growth spikes, which is sometimes indicative of a purchase of followers.

Of course, don’t stop there…

How much quality engagement do they receive?

Anyone can buy fans and followers. They can even buy engagement. But they can’t buy true interactions. If you are looking to craft your social media strategy based off of how competitors are using social media, be sure that you are modeling yours and your client’s on a competitor that is receiving true engagement from their audience.

How often do they update each of their networks?

This revolves back to content, except in this case, it’s social media content. How many times do competitors update each of their social networks, and how do they do it? Do they ask questions, post links, and/or share photos and videos? And most importantly, what types of updates get the most engagement from their audiences?

You may not be able to tell their ROI, but there’s a good chance that the more exposure they get on a status update, the more likely that update is to convert compared to one with little to no response.

What do you include as part of your competitive research strategy?

Most Frequently Used Linux Iptables Rules With Examples

This article will help you to create IPtables rules that you can directly use for your daily or routine needs, These examples will act as basic templates for you to work on iptables with these rules which suit your specific requirement.

Deleting the IPtables or Existing Rules

Before you start building new IPtables set of rules, you should clean up all the default rules, and existing rules. Use the IPtables flush command, below are some examples –

#iptables --flush (or) # iptables --F Default Policies Chain

The default policy is ACCEPT, change the policy to DROP for all the INPUT, FORWARD, OUTPUT.

# iptables -P INPUT DROP # iptables -P FORWARD DROP # iptables -P OUTPUT DROP

For every firewall rule, we need to define two rules, i.e., one for In-coming and another for Out-going.

If we trust the internal users, we can use the DROP for incoming rules, and the default outgoing will be ACCEPT.

Allowing HTTP & HTTPS Incoming Connections

The below rules will allow all the incoming traffic of HTTP & HTTPS (80 & 443)

iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 80 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 443 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 443 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Allowing only SSH to a Network

The below rules will allow only outgoing ssh connection from the internal network means we can ssh only from network only

iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp -d --dport 3306 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --sport 3306 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Allowing the Incoming MySQL port (3306) for TCP Traffic.

Below is the example which has incoming & outgoing traffic on port 3306 (mysql) for eth0 adaptor.

iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 3306 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 3306 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Allowing Incoming MySQL Port (3306) for a Specific Network

The below example will allow 3306 (mysql) for a specific network 192.168.87.x.

iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -s --dport 3306 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 3306 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Allowing Multiple Ports with a Single Rule

The below rules will allow incoming connections from outside to multiple ports, instead of writing multiple rules, we can also write rules with multiple ports together as shown below.

Here, were are allowing mysql, Http & Https in a single rule.

iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m multiport --dports 3306,80,443 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp -m multiport --sports 3306,80,443 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Allowing Outgoing MySQL

This is different from the incoming connection, we allow both new and established connections on the OUTPUT chain, but whereas in INPUT, we allow only the established chain.

This rule will allow only outgoing connection to MySQL when we try to connect to MySQL server from our Linux box.

iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --dport 3306-m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --sport 3306 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Allow Sendmail Traffic

These rules will allow mails using sendmail or postfix port 25.

iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 25 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 25 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Allowing IMAP & POP3 Ports

This rule will allow to send or receive emails from IMAP or POP3

iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 143 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 143 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 110 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 110 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Forward a Port to 5722 to 22(SSH)

These rules will forward the total traffic which comes from port 5722 to port 22. That means, the incoming connection for ssh can come from both 5722 and 22.

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d --dport 5722 -j DNAT --to Allowing Port 873 (rsync) for Backups

These rules will allow to you to take backups or copy data using rsync from a specific network

iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -s --dport 873 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 873 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT Blocking an IP address

If we want to block a particular IP address.


This will be useful if we want to block some IP address where they are downloading or trying to access the server, where we can block the IP for further investigation.

# iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -s “$ BLOCK_ADDRESS ” -j DROP # iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -s “$ BLOCK_ADDRESS ” -j DROP

This above example will block the TCP/IP traffic on the eth0 for that particular IP address.

We can add a network in the variable if you want to restrict access to the server from outside

By using the above iptables rules or modifying the rules and ports, we can secure the connection or network/server. We can also modify the network or ports accordingly to fit our environment. And these iptables rules are written in a simple shell script format, so we can use them in writing the shell scripts to apply on multiple servers.

God Mode Ai: The Ai

Unlock the Power of Automation with God Mode: The AI Tool that Automates Complex Tasks! Boost Efficiency, Save Time and Streamline Your Workflow Today! Try Now!

God Mode is an AI-powered tool that has the ability to self-generate tasks, take user prompts, and act on new tasks until it meets the original objective. It’s a unique tool that has been designed to automate complex tasks that would otherwise take a lot longer to complete manually. The tool is not entirely automated, as the user has approval rights for every step, allowing for redirection as well.

I began testing the tool with a task that I have already done manually, which was to create a strategy plan to research and engage with art buyers inside large retailers and merch brands. God Mode immediately conducted market research via Google, found lists, and started writing text files with notes.

After letting it run for over an hour, I added a couple of feedback notes to course correct the results. The tool successfully researched and developed a plan, created documents with engagement steps, and created a Python file to perform a specific task. However, it did not pull any contact information, which was a problem. It began to loop over and over, trying to pull contacts from LinkedIn, Google, and directories, but couldn’t pull the data properly.

I decided to test another idea, inspired by @elonmusk’s interview on Monday night, where he talked about finding the meaning of life. I set out to create “TruthGPT” to automate data research, store the data, interpret the dataset, and output findings and understandings on its own.

It worked much more effectively this time, and below are the list of the initial tasks of research.

See More: God Mode Auto GPT: How AI is Revolutionizing Automation

God Mode successfully researched the concept extensively, then created its own documentation to store the findings. It then trained itself on the data, which is quite impressive. After that, it created and ran a Python file, our own “TruthGPT”, to interpret its own dataset and give an output.

The tool successfully researched the concept extensively, then created its own documentation to store the findings. It then trained itself on the data, which is quite impressive. After that, it created and ran a Python file, our own “TruthGPT”, to interpret its own dataset and give an output.

The tool successfully created a text file with the five potential keys to reality as tasked to do, and well, simply put, we made a “TruthGPT” and found the meaning of life. (YAY! 🎉)

(Jokes aside, no, I don’t believe this is an actual “TruthGPT”). However, the process of automating complex tasks with ChatGPT is quite interesting, and soon, I don’t think there will be any gaps.

God Mode takes user prompts and acts on new tasks until it meets the original objective. The user has approval rights for every step, which allows for redirection if needed.

God Mode can automate complex tasks that would otherwise take a lot longer to complete manually.

The benefits of using God Mode include faster task completion, increased efficiency, and the ability to redirect tasks if needed.

In conclusion, God Mode is an AI-powered tool that is capable of automating complex tasks, thus increasing efficiency and reducing the time required to complete them. The tool takes user prompts and acts on new tasks until the original objective is met, with the user having approval rights for every step. While the tool is not entirely automated, it offers a unique approach to automating tasks with the ability to redirect tasks if necessary.

The tool has been tested, and it has shown its ability to conduct market research, create plans, and run Python files. Although there were some limitations in pulling data from sources, the tool was able to perform the desired tasks effectively. Additionally, the tool was tested on the creation of “TruthGPT,” which successfully researched and interpreted data to provide an output, even if it was just for fun.

Share this:



Like this:




Oracle Says Google Knowingly ‘Broke The Rules’ With Java

“This case is about Google’s use, in Google’s business, of somebody else’s property without permission,” said Michael Jacobs, an attorney for Oracle, in his opening remarks to the jury.

Oracle sued Google 18 months ago, arguing that its Android operating system infringes Java patents and copyrights that Oracle acquired when it bought Sun Microsystems. Google denies any wrongdoing and says it doesn’t need a license for the parts of Java it used.

Judge William Alsup, who is hearing the case, warned both sides on Monday that they’ll need to show good cause for any evidence submitted at trial to be kept from the public, and that unflattering details about either side might emerge.

“Unless it’s the recipe for Coca-Cola, it’s going to be public,” Alsup said. “If it reveals something embarrassing about the way one of these companies works, too bad. That’s going to be out there for the public to see.”

Most of the opening day was taken up with jury selection, but Jacobs had time to deliver Oracle’s opening statement before the proceedings wrapped up. Google will give its opening statement Tuesday morning.

Jacobs cited several emails to and from Google executives that he said would show that Google knew it needed a license for Java and that, having failed to negotiate one, it developed Android with Java anyway.

Google’s use of Oracle’s intellectual property wasn’t a mistake or the result of any confusion, Jacobs told the jury.

“The decision to use Oracle’s intellectual property in Android was taken at the highest levels, with a lot of comprehension and awareness about what was going on,” he said.

Google had to develop Android quickly, and it had to attract developers to be successful, he said. “How did they meet those requirements? The answer is with components of Java.”

Other companies such as eBay, Cisco Systems and General Electric bought licenses to use Java, but Google “broke the basic set of rules governing the Java community,” Jacobs said.

Some big Silicon Valley names are expected to be called to testify in the trial. Oracle’s witness list includes its CEO, Larry Ellison, Google CEO Larry Page, Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt and former Sun CEOs Scott McNealy and Jonathan Schwartz.

Before jury selection took place Monday, Alsup had to settle some last-minute disputes between the two sides.

Google thought it would be unfair if Oracle were allowed to tell the jury it paid $7.4 billion to buy Sun, because it might inflate the value of Java in the minds of the jurors.

“They’ve been dying to throw that number around,” Robert Van Nest, an attorney for Google, told the judge.

Alsup ruled against him but nevertheless cautioned Oracle to be careful how it used such figures. “The idea that you can throw big numbers around in front of the jury and somehow jack up the damages award if there is one … that’s not going to be allowed,” Alsup said.

The trial will be held in three phases: first to hear the copyright claims, then the patent claims, and then any damages Oracle might be awarded. Oracle is seeking about $1 billion in damages and an injunction to block Google from shipping any infringing code.

The lawsuit is seen by many as a test case for whether software APIs (application programming interfaces) can be subject to copyright.

The trial resumes at 8 a.m. Pacific Time Tuesday morning. It’s being held at the U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

Kickstarter Changes Rules So Nobody Runs Off With Your Money

Kickstarter changes rules so nobody runs off with your money

If you’ve ever back a crowd-funded campaign, you know that feeling you get just after submitting your cash. It sometimes comes back months later, when the project goes off the rails or hits a snag. Will you ever see the thing you paid for? Kickstarter is making sure you will, even threatening litigation.

Changes to their terms of use have been further sealed in cement, making sure that those of us who back a project get what we were promised. Short of actually getting whatever it was we backed, the person or people behind the campaign must detail exactly where the money went, and refund any unused funds.

The new terms and conditions don’t handle one nagging issue, though: late shipments. If you back a project, these new guidelines make it clear that the people in charge of the campaign are responsible to you, but they can still delay a project endlessly (in theory). Here are the new rules, laid out by Kickstarter:

When a project is successfully funded, the creator must complete the project and fulfill each reward. Once a creator has done so, they’ve satisfied their obligation to their backers.

Throughout the process, creators owe their backers a high standard of effort, honest communication, and a dedication to bringing the project to life. At the same time, backers must understand that when they back a project, they’re helping to create something new — not ordering something that already exists. There may be changes or delays, and there’s a chance something could happen that prevents the creator from being able to finish the project as promised.

If a creator is unable to complete their project and fulfill rewards, they’ve failed to live up to the basic obligations of this agreement. To right this, they must make every reasonable effort to find another way of bringing the project to the best possible conclusion for backers. A creator in this position has only remedied the situation and met their obligations to backers if:

• they post an update that explains what work has been done, how funds were used, and what prevents them from finishing the project as planned;

• they work diligently and in good faith to bring the project to the best possible conclusion in a timeframe that’s communicated to backers;

• they’re able to demonstrate that they’ve used funds appropriately and made every reasonable effort to complete the project as promised;

• they’ve been honest, and have made no material misrepresentations in their communication to backers; and

• they offer to return any remaining funds to backers who have not received their reward (in proportion to the amounts pledged), or else explain how those funds will be used to complete the project in some alternate form.

The creator is solely responsible for fulfilling the promises made in their project. If they’re unable to satisfy the terms of this agreement, they may be subject to legal action by backers.

With this rule clarification, Kickstarter is also further distancing themselves from projects. The company seems intent on being the platform where we find stuff, not the responsible party or mediator.

Source: Kickstarter

Update the detailed information about Governing Ethical Ai: Rules & Regulations Preventing Unethical Ai on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!